Fischer points the finger at “animal rights insanity” and the “ongoing failure of the West to take counsel on practical matters from the Scripture.”
If the counsel of the Judeo-Christian tradition had been followed, Tillikum would have been put out of everyone's misery back in 1991 and would not have had the opportunity to claim two more human lives.So what do you want us to do, Bryan, sue Sea World or stone Chuck Thompson and his whale? How are we really supposed to take counsel on this practical matter from Scripture? Didn’t you just say we are in this situation because we weren’t following the biblical rules? Why draw the line now? You stated that Thompson had blood on his hands. What do you think you were implying?
But, the Scripture soberly warns, if one of your animals kills a second time because you didn't kill it after it claimed its first human victim, this time you die right along with your animal. To use the example from Exodus, if your ox kills a second time, "the ox shall be stoned, and its owner also shall be put to death." (Exodus 21:29)
If I were the family of Dawn Brancheau, I'd sue the pants off SeaWorld for allowing this killer whale to kill again after they were well aware of its violent history.
SeaWorld is apparently, however, unrepentant. Chuck Thompson, its curator in charge of animal behavior, says Tilly continues to be "a valuable asset not only from a breeding standpoint but from a behavior standpoint, too." Chuck might want to ask Dawn's Mom what she thinks about that.
Thompson did add, helpfully, "I think we need to evaluate his behavior and everything that's happened up to this point." You're about 19 years too late, Chuck, and the blood of Dawn Brancheau is on your hands.
Fischer, loving the publicity, but not wanting to be seen as madman, clarified in a second blog article that he didn’t think the whale should be stoned, but humanely euthanized without using rocks. He also tries to dodge his earlier retribution suggestions.
Also, and likewise bizarrely, I have been reported as calling for the owners of SeaWorld to be stoned, which of course I did not do either. I called for legal action against them to hold them accountable for negligently exposing an employee to life-endangering risk. Perhaps this additional note will reduce the level of unhinged bloviating on the internetActually, no it won’t Bryan. My unhinged bloviating is coming now, especially in light of your closing statement.
One unanticipated benefit of the mindless overreaction my blog has generated is that a lot more people know what's in Exodus 21 than did a week ago. I'm happy to serve humanity by increasing biblical literacy, one passage at a time.If you think your unhinged Bible-study has been a helpful addition to Biblical literacy, I disagree. If you think people look at Christianity differently after your statements hit the news, they probably do, but unfortunately not in a helpful way.
Can I suggest you reread the passage where an adulterous woman was dragged before Jesus because by OT standards she should be publically stoned? Do you remember what Jesus did instead of picking up a rock? Do you think what he wrote in the sand might apply to your understanding of scripture. It sure impacted the religious scholars that day. You should follow their lead and silently slip away.